Leicester Operator Receives Fine for Missing Multi-Venue Exclusion Requirements
Written by Viktor Neumann · Aug 20, 2026

Leicester Operator Receives Fine for Missing Multi-Venue Exclusion Requirements

The UK Gambling Commission has issued a £150,000 penalty to Holland Park Leisure Limited after the company failed to join the mandatory multi-operator self-exclusion scheme that covers three adult gaming centres it runs in Leicester city centre, and the breach involved Social Responsibility Code Provision 3.5.6 which requires operators to participate in local schemes designed to let players block access across multiple venues in one area.
Holland Park Leisure Limited operates those three sites, and the regulator determined that the absence from the scheme left players without a straightforward way to exclude themselves from all participating locations at once, a step that forms part of broader efforts to limit gambling-related harm on high streets.
Details of the Breach and Regulatory Action
According to the official announcement the company did not sign up to the scheme even though participation is required under the code, and this gap meant customers could not use a single exclusion request to cover every venue operated by the firm in the local area, while other operators in Leicester had already joined the system.
The fine follows a review that confirmed teh non-compliance, and the Commission applied the penalty to address the shortfall without suspending or revoking the operating licence, a choice that keeps the venues open while enforcing the rule.
How the Multi-Operator Self-Exclusion Scheme Works
The scheme lets individuals register once and have that exclusion applied across multiple land-based gambling premises in the same locality, and it reduces the chance that someone trying to avoid gambling will simply move from one venue to another nearby, an approach that has been rolled out in various UK towns and cities to support harm reduction.
Operators must join the scheme when it operates in their area, and the code provision sets out the exact obligations around data sharing and customer notification, requirements that Holland Park Leisure Limited did not meet during the period examined by the regulator.

Context of High-Street Gambling Debates
Political discussions continue around the future of high-street gambling venues, and this case sits within those conversations because it highlights how licensing conditions are applied when operators do not follow self-exclusion rules that aim to protect vulnerable customers.
Local authorities and campaign groups have raised questions about venue density in city centres like Leicester, yet the Commission focused its action strictly on the code breach rather than broader location issues, and the penalty stands as a direct response to the missing participation.
Next Steps for the Operator
Holland Park Leisure Limited must now join the scheme to bring its three centres into compliance, and the company faces ongoing monitoring to confirm that customer protection measures remain in place after the fine, a standard follow-up process used by the regulator in similar cases.
Those who study gambling regulation note that such penalties encourage other operators to check their own participation records, and the outcome reinforces that the multi-operator scheme functions only when every relevant licence holder takes part.
Conclusion
The £150,000 fine issued to Holland Park Leisure Limited underscores the Gambling Commission's focus on enforcing the self-exclusion code across land-based sites, and it provides a clear record of how non-participation is addressed when the scheme is active in a local area. The case remains limited to this single operator and its three Leicester venues, with the requirement now in place for the company to complete its registration and maintain compliance going forward.